Skip to content

Newsletters

What an independent practice can say that a template cannot

Groups have buying power, budget and systems. What they do not have is the ability to name your town or your hygienist. That is the ground an independent can hold.

7 min read

Start by being fair about what groups do well

Dental service organizations get talked about badly by people trying to sell something to independents, and most of it does not survive contact with the facts. Groups have real advantages: purchasing power on supplies and labs, longer opening hours, coverage when a dentist is out, centralized billing and credentialing, and a marketing budget a single office cannot match.

For a lot of dentists, joining one is a rational decision, and for a lot of patients it is a perfectly good place to be seen. None of what follows is an argument that groups are bad. It is an argument about where an independent has room, which is a different question.

Centralization has a cost, and it is communication

The thing that makes a group efficient is that decisions get made once and applied everywhere. That is how you run thirty offices without thirty of everything, and it is good management.

It also means the communication has to be templated. A marketing team supporting dozens of locations cannot write a different letter for each town, cannot name the hygienist at each front desk, and cannot mention the school district or the road works. The material has to be interchangeable to be produceable at that scale.

That is a structural constraint, not a failure of effort. And it leaves a gap that a single practice can walk straight into.

Do not fight on the ground they own

The fastest way for an independent to lose money is to try to beat a group at the things scale is for.

  • Paid search volume. You are bidding against a marketing budget spread over dozens of offices. You can run ads sensibly. You cannot outspend them.
  • Price. A group that buys supplies at volume has a cost structure you do not have.
  • Hours and coverage. Seven days and evenings across multiple sites is a staffing answer, not a marketing one.
  • Breadth of services under one roof. Specialists in-house is a scale feature.

Fight on the list instead

The patients already in your software are the one audience where the budget difference does not decide the outcome. Reaching them costs postage or nothing, and no amount of ad spend from anybody else takes them off your list.

This is the whole strategy in a sentence: a group will always be able to buy more strangers than you. Neither of you can buy the people who already know you.

A group can always buy more strangers than you can. Neither of you can buy the people who already know you.

Blue Ocean Strategies

What goes in an issue that a template could not print

The test for every item is whether a marketing department covering thirty offices could have produced it. If it could, it is filler.

  • The dentist’s own name and voice, on a page, sounding like the person patients meet.
  • The hygienist who has been at the practice eleven years, by name, with something specific about her.
  • The town. The team at the parade, the league you sponsor, the intersection that floods every August.
  • A decision you made and why. New hours because families kept asking. A second front-desk hire because the phone was ringing out.
  • Continuity itself — the fact that the same people have been there for years, which is something patients notice and rarely hear stated.

Continuity is the thing patients actually value

When a patient says they like their dentist, they usually mean something about familiarity. Somebody remembers them. They do not have to explain themselves from scratch. The same face is at the desk.

That is worth saying out loud, because it is the one claim an independent can make that is entirely non-clinical, entirely honest and entirely unavailable to a business built on interchangeable staffing. It is not a statement about care quality — it is a statement about how it feels to be a patient there.

It is also the reason the newsletter and the practice fit each other. A publication that arrives every month for years is itself an argument about continuity — the same masthead, the same voice, the same people mentioned in it, showing up in the same house issue after issue. A practice that changes hands or changes staff constantly would struggle to write it, which is precisely what makes it worth something when you can.

Reviews are the one search result you can beat them on

A group can outbid an independent for the ads at the top of a local search. What sits underneath the ads is the map listing, and that is decided by relevance, proximity and the quality of the profile rather than by budget. A single practice with a complete listing, current hours, real photos and a steady flow of recent reviews can hold that space against an office with thirty times the marketing spend.

Reviews are also where a group’s scale works against it. Its reviews are spread across every location and get written about a brand. Yours are written about a person the reviewer met, by name, and that reads differently to somebody deciding between two offices in the same town.

The catch is that this only works if the asking is systematic. A practice that requests reviews when it remembers gets a listing that looks abandoned in eighteen months.

Be honest about when the group model is the better answer

There are situations where the advice above is not the right advice, and pretending otherwise would be dishonest.

If a dentist is planning to sell within a couple of years, the buyer is likely a group and the effort belongs in the numbers, not the mailbox. If the practice is already at capacity with a waiting list, more visibility solves a problem it does not have. And if the owner genuinely does not want to think about marketing at all, joining an organization that handles it is a legitimate answer rather than a defeat.

The practical program for an independent

For a practice that intends to stay independent, this is the short list, in order.

  1. Get the patient list into one clean file with real addresses and mobiles.
  2. Fix the Google Business Profile and get a steady flow of recent reviews.
  3. Start a monthly newsletter in the dentist’s own voice, print or digital, and hold the schedule.
  4. Run an email reactivation sequence to the patients who have not been in for a year or more.
  5. Make sure the phone gets answered and missed calls get returned quickly.
  6. Add advertising once all of the above is catching what it sends.

The schedule is the whole game

One newsletter is a nice gesture. Twelve is a publication, and the difference between them is entirely about whether the fourth one went out on time in a month when the practice was busy.

This is where an in-house attempt usually ends. The person who volunteered has a real job, the month gets away from them, and the issue slips. Then it slips again, and by the third slip nobody mentions it. Whoever produces it, the commitment to a date is the part that has to be real.

How we work, plainly

We write and produce the issue from a short monthly call, design it in the practice’s brand, print and mail it, and send the digital flipbook and email version to the same list the same week. Print and postage are billed at cost. Digital-only is a real option at a lower price.

You deal with a small team directly, founder Brandon Ostfeld included, and the writing is built around your practice rather than run off a template — which would be a strange thing to sell as an answer to templated communication. There is no minimum patient count and no maximum. We do not manage social accounts, and we do not make clinical claims on anyone’s behalf.

Quick answers

Related questions

No. Groups do plenty well — buying power, hours, coverage, systems — and joining one is a rational choice for a lot of dentists. The point is narrower: centralized communication cannot be local, and that is where an independent has room.

On volume, no. You can still run ads sensibly against tightly chosen terms in a small radius. What you should not do is treat a bidding war as the main plan when the group has a budget spread over dozens of offices.

No. There is no maximum and no minimum. A larger list means a larger print and postage bill, both billed at cost, and it usually means better per-piece rates because of the volume.

Usually one issue with both locations on the masthead, mailed to both lists. If the two offices genuinely feel like different practices, it can be two versions, which costs more. We will price it honestly either way.

We do. It comes from a short monthly call, gets written in the dentist’s voice, and you approve a proof before anything ships. Your time is roughly twenty minutes a month plus the read-through.

Want this done for you?

We write, design, print and send the whole thing. You spend about twenty minutes a month on it.

No pitch deck, no discovery-call gauntlet. One conversation, one straight answer.

See the workBook a call